First of all, I want to say that this question will never cease to exist, so I believe kindness and courtesy should always be present in the response. However, the problem lies in the context you provide; the basis on which you ask your question is flawed.

And I say this because no matter how much of an expert someone is on the subject, or how many years they have in the field, they will eventually encounter "bitcoin volatility."

We live with it daily; volatility is inherent in financial assets; it is the "soul" of any type of financial asset that faces supply and demand.

Now, bitcoin has the peculiarity that, unlike any other financial asset that faces supply and demand, it loses value almost instantly as it loses percentage value. And that loss is often related to confidence. No other asset since bitcoin's inception has ever lost more than 80% of its value and then recovered so dramatically, even tripling its value after such a dramatic drop.

And that, in essence, is what drives traditional economists "crazy," or those who don't understand that this voracious volatility is an essential part of bitcoin, at least at this stage. This is because more appropriate percentage parameters, or what's called the horizontal base (or 'bed') of an asset, are certainly not yet perceptible in bitcoin.

But this will come, and perhaps neither you nor anyone else logged into this forum today will live to see it (imo ), but it will surely come.

But when that happens, a 1% change will be categorized as highly volatile in the future, just as we currently see with double-digit percentage losses, or the most recent drop of more than +30%.

In conclusion, bitcoin volatility is normal.

No es que quiera eliminar a D P D a prop�sito de la cita, es que me parece que; "joder" llego a tiempo tu comentario del 2025,digo a poco al menos llego, pero que si lo haces en el 2026 es de no expertos en la materia.  

Me ha gustado lo de baratas, sencillas y convenientes, eso define esa simple regla a seguir, por el simple hecho de "exponer" (no cuadra, porque es p�blica, en fin)  la Clave P�blica, hoy en d�a muy "olvidada" en su habitual uso y utilidad.

Aunque, hay que decirlo, y con firmeza; estaba dise�ada para compartir con toda seguridad, en el pasado, ya que en el futuro, se perder� una o dos de esas palabras Toda, Seguridad.

En conclusi�n; la soluci�n baratas, sencillas y convenientes^{v�a porfi} es "soluci�n sencilla" mencionada en OP.

Vaya pelea por el Peso "Gallo" o no? es semipesados o pesados, esa categor�a (Box) de +90 kilogramos, realmente no quiero investigarlo, pero como sea bitcoin tiene un problema con su peso no se decide, empieza a comer Hamburguesas y luego se le olvidan las papitas y la Coca-cola para mantener el peso...

Como sea, tenemos el mismo m�nimo a pesar de todo: $83.862,25 d�a 1. Creo que peso pluma es +70k, no nos gusta, ni la categor�a ni el cantante 

It's great to be able to use these FBs prize like this, since they allow for more flexible wagering. Anyway,  Congratulations!.
I think it�s a matter of preference, but I think for most people it�s better to have them set up as deposit-based (I hope this idea is replicated in other casinos)

Ah, look at that � there are things to compete for and reasons to keep the enthusiasm going for those of us at the bottom. Difficult, sure, but it�s not something that can�t be handled with the Chips (quote). For now, I have quite a few, but these ⚠️� if anyone wants them, I also have them in red...

An interesting week to highlight, with over 20 goals. Who would�ve thought we�d get 8 goals in a VS:VS match? Anyway, a week where things didn�t go as planned.
_/side remark_/
Don�t come at me with �I knew it.� Those who choice  Leipzig had the "Grays Sports Almanac*" on hand ( there was no other way).

---

*

^{Oh damn, 1950-2000 expired*}

Well, what a victory for Bilbao! Although an Atl�tico win would have only helped improve my SD (important), Paco knew something and predicted the draw, so he didn�t gain another point either. Anyway, after five weeks (Rounds) unbeaten, a humiliating defeat  � almost 5�1. Let�s hope 4�2 looks better. GG, paco92x

Totalmente, de hecho es tal cual como dices, el send. En otras ideas, creo que con eso ( apuestas - buyin) cierro ciclos de participaci�n en cualquier tipo de Pool en el futuro cercano al menos en el 2025-2026, para no cerrar del todo, siempre es divertido y algo siempre dejan...

Pool-F1:
Quer�a poner a Max, Lan, Pia pero no, volv� hacer lo que me sac� del top3- top5, no creer en este tipo, en fin , pero despu�s de la tabla resumen que hice me di cuenta que nil_ koroll ( algo as�) estuvo 8 semanas liderando, y ahora ni siquiera est� en el top 10. (Por cierto, y de hecho, no lo sab�a, pero te v� en las estad�sticas de leaderweek)

Pero eso en esencia es el gustito de los Pool, en fin, veremos c�mo termina la F1, y ese jugoso #1 si que estaba (est�) interesante.

My winning streak on FB's is good streak , but as my friend Darbit says, 'winning them afterward*' has gotten tough. Real Madrid messed up my parlay (other Casino, FB), and now Chelsea's got me under a curse"*"�lol. At least Sunderland backed up my gut feeling... I were way closer to 9x than 1.77x. 

J: bueno es lo que digo, no es gracioso pero como los del Norte tienen humor negro, el Roasted, tu sabes.

A prop�sito de este hilo que te parece si hacemos un 0.1mBTC, para la F1 de este fin semana, el que mejor puntos consiga gana el 0.1 mBTC, empate no pasa nada, de hecho un punto de ventaja debe tener el ganador, es decir, por ejemplo; 10 no pierde contra 10.5, pero si contra 11.