Bitcoin as decentralized technology has teached that oligopoly/centralization are not the best scenario in any case.
Actually rules explains clearly how to handle this cases of bully and to be honest we are adults, we don't need "groups"/internal police.
I know very well the reason and effort and good faith behind this proposal since there is one of the trustesd user of forum involved.
Anyway, it could be impossible get an "official" recognition by forum rules/admin since there are already other rules and this could appear questionable...
Imagine you made some mistakes on your decision, should we have another alliance?

What there is an "opinable question"? Like a user spreading false accusation mixed with real ones? ...
What about DT1? This is a system already implemented, ok we don't need to trust a "central" group in the forum, but if everyone could create "an alliance"... it would be a gang fight ...

[ot]
One of the last rules that bitcoin would teach to you is: you are alone on this earth. Stop to seek help.
No friends, no family, no community. There is only you and your txid/privkey/wallets/explorers.... Even when we decide on how to "deal" with alleged "friends/brothers" it's evident we are not trusting a process or a friend in the same way we trust bitcoin.
Trust in bitcoin is just superpartes. Trust in humans no... and has also some interpretrations.
Anyway, best of the luck for this alliance, as told before, in any case due person invovled you have my support even if I would not join directly.