We, who are reading the details of the scam accusations, cannot solve any issues. We can just give our input and based on the facts provided by the gamblers and the casinos, can only judge who seems to be right and who seems to be at false.
As a rule of thumb, generally if there are many complaints about any particular casino and a lot of scam accusations are opening up against any casino, then it's more likely that the casino is at fault. If there are very few complaints, then it's most probably the gambler's fault but still every case may vary and can't be judged based on this assumption.
It should always be based on the evidence, but in most cases the casino usually wins, especially if they have a solid reputation.
The evidence we see isn�t always complete or could even be limited, because casinos won�t reveal everything for �confidentiality� reasons. If they show too much to the public, it might also cause problems with their regulators.
And look at cases like 1xbit, even when the evidence isn�t that strong, once enough people complain, everyone will assume they�re at fault.
