You are confusing different things. Limit a player just means you can not bet a high amount, like they only let you bet $50 on a slip

What you are saying about refusing to pay is not limiting, it's freezing the account

They do not need to conduct business with the player but they must pay what was already owed

Spoke too soon. Right after my last post, my sports limits got randomly slashed again out of nowhere.

This highlights a fundamental flaw in Duel’s infrastructure: their automated risk bot completely overrides manual supervisor overrides. Team cleared my account as 100% legitimate, yet the system just dragged me back into another unprovoked restriction loop.

If the platform's automated code keeps undoing what management manually approves, the entire "fair review" process is broken. It's impossible to rely on a site where the system constantly fights against its own team's word.

I’m ready to get back to the action, but I can't do that if I have to fight a rogue machine every hour. George or Monarch, can you guys step in and permanently whitelist my account to stop this bot loop? Let’s get this sorted for good so I can just enjoy playing here.

It's nothing wrong if a casino limits a player because they do not need to allow you to play. All they need to do is let you take your money out without issues

If I was in charge of an online casino of the size of Stake, I would definitely not give so much attention to nationalities of my gamblers, but rather their accumulated wager, their VIP status and the size of their deposits, so I would design an algorithm which would reward those who are the most profitable and loyal to the casino through time.

I mean Stake is a pretty big casino, even small and medium sized casinos have statistical tools which allow them to track where themajority of their gamblers are from and what countries are the ones which contribute the most to keeping their wallets full inn the medium and long term.

The question is Casinos like Stake do not have any actual reason to make such information public for anyone to see, they would not anything from allowing the general public to know where all their money comes from.

Also, casinos like this one do not pay as much attention to the nationality of their gamblers, they focus on the VIP tier of each individual gambler when comes to offering bonuses and promotions, because their automated system allows them to pursue such strategy, which in the end, it is the most profitable one for themselves as a business.

My sports limits on Duel are fully back to normal.

It looks like it was just a temporary system glitch/sync delay that got sorted out by the sports risk team (George). Big thanks for the quick action.

Whoever have any information about the real location of Paul or Bennet, ping me.

From the specifications of the Op, I don't think anyone here can sell out such account to him and what others have said about the using of the account after the purchase is not far from the truth and they might be part of the plan. And if really it is for such purpose then the original owner of the account is at risk because when government will trace the account, it will be directly to the creator of the account because such account has completed the KYC. Be careful with your accounts in the forum.

Do you really think someone would be so stupid as to share or sold to you an account registered under their own documents so you could conduct criminal operations while the person who owns the account went to jail for what you did?

OK, then that model was probably made for people who will gamble in Shuffle WITH or WITHOUT the airdrop. They don't want people to play in the casino just to join the airdrop. They merely want to reward the loyal users that already have.

That's a good model from both Shuffle and their loyal users' viewpoint. But it's bad for those people who want to exploit services merely for the airdrop.